Communication
In
my opinion all three of the modalities; written text, audio, and f2f all
conveyed the same message: Jane needs me
(Mark) to complete a report that she gets information from in order to complete
her report. Her ability to complete and
meet her deadline is dependent upon me. I need to get my report done as soon as
possible as to not impact her.
- How did your interpretation of the message change from one modality to the next?
I didn’t really
see a change between the messages, obviously with the written text I can choose
to read it with an attitude, but I didn’t for that message. I (Mark) is in the wrong and needs to get his
report done, I don’t know if his report is past due, however it definitely has
an impact on Jane’s work.
- What factors influenced how you perceived the message?
Tone of
voice, my tells me all the time, it’s not what I say, but my tone. 20 years in the Marine Corps has conditioned
me to be very direct and matter of fact.
I have to be aware of that when communicating to others.
- Which form of communication best conveyed the true meaning and intent of the message?
The voicemail
and the f2f meeting, because I could hear the tone, it also I see the need she
has for me to get my part done.
- What are the implications of what you learned from this exercise for communicating effectively with members of a project team?
Messages need to be clearly
stated. More importantly due dates need
to be established and accountability for completing tasks enforced. If there are dependencies, they should be
stated and each person needs to understand the impact they could have on the
rest of the team’s ability to complete their tasks.
No comments:
Post a Comment